AO
Matter Intake

New Matter Intake

Screen incoming requests, run conflict checks, gather documents and assign the right lawyer before opening a matter.

Open intakes
14
Ready to open
3
Awaiting docs
6
Conflict review
2
Intake pipeline
New Request1
Halden Rail Group
Corporate M&A
High2/6
Conflict Check2
Marisol Vega
Family · Divorce
Med4/5
Trident Cargo Ltd
Shipping Dispute
Critical5/7
Documents Needed1
Kaito Yamamoto
IP · Trademark
Low3/8
Lawyer Assignment1
Bramble Foods Co-op
Real Estate
Med7/7
Ready to Open1
Elena Volkov
Criminal Defence
High6/6
Intake requests · full detail
Halden Rail Group
Corporate M&A · via reception@ashvance.law
Completeness
32%
HighCorporateConflict: pendingRecommend: A. Okafor
Marisol Vega
Family · Divorce · via walk-in
Completeness
58%
MedFamilyConflict: clearRecommend: L. Ibarra
Trident Cargo Ltd
Shipping Dispute · via P. Adeyemi (referral)
Completeness
62%
CriticalShippingConflict: reviewRecommend: P. Adeyemi
Kaito Yamamoto
IP · Trademark · via web form
Completeness
44%
LowIPConflict: clearRecommend: S. Ravel
Bramble Foods Co-op
Real Estate · via M. Chen (referral)
Completeness
88%
MedRealConflict: clearRecommend: M. Chen
Elena Volkov
Criminal Defence · via phone
Completeness
96%
HighCriminalConflict: clearRecommend: N. Salim
Intake form preview
Client name
Bramble Foods Co-op
Matter type
Real Estate · Acquisition
Value estimate
$2.4M
Urgency
Medium
Source
M. Chen · referral
Preferred contact
email
Document checklist
  • Signed engagement letter
  • Client ID (2 forms)
  • Company registration
  • Property title deed
  • Prior correspondence
  • Retainer receipt
  • Conflict declaration
Practice area
CorporateLitigationReal EstateIPFamilyCriminalEmploymentTax
Section A · Selected Intake Detail
INT-2044 · Sable Energy Trading Ltd
Client & contact
Prospective client
Sable Energy Trading Ltd
Contact
H. Almeida, General Counsel
Sector
Energy trading
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Referral source
Existing client — Meridian
Confidentiality
Elevated
Matter
Type
Commercial arbitration
Description
LNG cargo shortfall dispute
Opposing parties
Northgate Bulk Carriers
Estimated value
$2.1M
Urgency
14-day response
Requested lawyer
J. Hollis KC
Commercial
Billing arrangement
Blended hourly + success fee
Estimated team
1 partner, 1 associate, 1 paralegal
Retainer proposed
$120,000
Credit risk
Low
Expected duration
9–14 months
Fee sensitivity
Medium
Section B · Conflict Relationship Map
Relationship network
Sable Energy Trading
No conflictPossibleDirect conflictManual review
Select a node to inspect the relationship.
Conflict risk breakdown
Direct adversity74%
Former-client conflict66%
Shared director48%
Confidential information exposure71%
Lawyer personal conflict12%
Related-party concern34%
Jurisdictional restriction8%
Reputational concern29%
Overall conflict score 62 / 100 · clearance level: Partner + Compliance · waiver required from Meridian.
Section C · Intake Readiness Checklist
Acceptance readiness
62% ready
Identity
Matter
Compliance
Commercial
Documentation
Section E · Matter Acceptance Score
Acceptance scorecard
Strategic fit86%
Revenue potential92%
Capacity fit54%
Conflict safety38%
Client quality88%
Reputation fit74%
Complexity81%
Collection confidence84%
Recommended decision
Accept with conditions
  • · Information barrier around J. Hollis KC (M-1642 history)
  • · Written waiver from Meridian Holdings
  • · Retainer raised to $150,000 given complexity
Section F · Assignment Recommendations
Recommended legal teams
Team A — Arbitration led
Partner
A. Okafor
Lead
P. Adeyemi
Associate
T. Morgan
Paralegal
E. Cole
Practice fit
91%
Capacity
78%
Conflict
Clear
Est. workload
460h
Est. cost
$318K
Available
05 Aug
Team B — Shipping specialist
Partner
J. Hollis KC
Lead
T. Morgan
Associate
N. Salim
Paralegal
E. Cole
Practice fit
96%
Capacity
41%
Conflict
Barrier required
Est. workload
440h
Est. cost
$352K
Available
19 Aug
Team C — Blended
Partner
S. Ravel
Lead
M. Chen
Associate
T. Morgan
Paralegal
N. Salim
Practice fit
62%
Capacity
88%
Conflict
Clear
Est. workload
510h
Est. cost
$296K
Available
01 Aug
Section G · Approval & Opening Workflow
Intake to matter opening
1
Request received
Client services
22 Jul
2
Initial screening
T. Morgan
23 Jul
3
Conflict check
Compliance
25 Jul
Barrier pending
4
Compliance review
Compliance
5
Commercial review
R. Fenwick
6
Partner approval
A. Okafor
7
Engagement signed
8
Retainer received
9
Matter number created
10
Team assigned
11
Matter opened
Section H · Intake Analytics
Intakes by source (12 weeks)
22
Referral
25
Existing client
20
Website
11
Directory
9
Counsel
9
Event
AcceptedRejected
Acceptance rate by practice area
Litigation74%
Corporate82%
IP68%
Real Estate88%
Family61%
Criminal44%
Average intake duration 6.2 days · target 5.0 days.
Rejection reasons
ReasonCountShareTrend
Conflict of interest1431%↑ 4
Capacity920%↑ 2
Credit risk716%
Below fee threshold613%↓ 1
Outside practice scope511%
Reputational49%↑ 1
Revenue potential by source ($K)
1240
Referral
1980
Existing
320
Website
180
Directory
640
Counsel
210
Event
Projected fees